MediMix Oncology
  • Home
  • Congresses
    • 2026
      • ESMO GI 2026
      • ASCO 2026
      • ELCC 2026
      • ENETS 2026
      • BSMO 50 YEARS
      • ASCO GU 2026
      • ASCO GI 2026
    • 2025
      • SABCS 2025
      • SIOG 2025
      • ESMO 2025
      • WCLC 2025
      • EADO 2025
  • STiP
  • Webinars
    • ESDO – GI Cancer – ASCO GI 2026
    • ESDO GI Cancer – ESMO 2025
  • Contact
  • Other specialties
    • Dermatology
    • Hematology
    • Respirology
    • Cardiology
    • Rheumatology
    • Neurology
  • SIGN UP
  • SIGN IN
    • Login
    • Account
ESMO GI 2026

Zanidatamab in HER2-positive mGEA: quality of life and dose optimisation

13 July 2026

Presented by Dr Filip Van Herpe (University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium) 

In this video, Dr Filip Van Herpe discusses two analyses from the phase III HERIZON-GEA-01 trial, presented at ESMO GI 2026 in Munich.1,2 HERIZON-GEA-01 evaluated first-line zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, with or without tislelizumab, versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA). The trial showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival with both zanidatamab-containing regimens, and a significant overall survival benefit with zanidatamab plus chemotherapy and tislelizumab versus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. 

The first analysis focused on health-related quality of life.1 Because diarrhoea is a known and frequent adverse event with zanidatamab, prophylactic loperamide was mandatory in the zanidatamab arms. Patient-reported outcomes showed that diarrhoea scores were higher early during treatment in the zanidatamab-containing arms, but this did not translate into a sustained negative impact on global health status, quality of life, or functional outcomes. After the initial treatment cycles, quality-of-life outcomes were broadly similar across treatment arms, and disease-specific symptoms were comparable. These findings suggest that the survival benefit of zanidatamab-based treatment was achieved with minimal detriment to patient-reported quality of life, provided diarrhoea is actively prevented and managed. 

The second analysis evaluated zanidatamab pharmacokinetics and dose optimisation.2 Population pharmacokinetic modelling showed that body weight was the main covariate with a clinically meaningful effect on exposure, supporting the use of a two-tiered, weight-based dosing strategy. Other factors, including age, sex, race, HER2 status and mild or moderate renal or hepatic impairment, did not require dose adjustment. The analysis supported both the 1800/2400 mg every-three-weeks regimen used in HERIZON-GEA-01 and the alternative 1200/1600 mg every-two-weeks regimen, offering flexibility for combination with chemotherapy schedules.

References:

  1. Shitara K, et al. Presented at ESMO GI 2026; Abstract 494O.
  2. Van Herpe P, et al. Presented at ESMO GI 2026; Abstract 602P.
Back to ESMO GI 2026

Tags:

in-depth

Share Article

Website created by MediMix © 2026 - Privacy Policy

  • Home
  • Congresses
    • 2026
      • ESMO GI 2026
      • ASCO 2026
      • ELCC 2026
      • ENETS 2026
      • BSMO 50 YEARS
      • ASCO GU 2026
      • ASCO GI 2026
    • 2025
      • SABCS 2025
      • SIOG 2025
      • ESMO 2025
      • WCLC 2025
      • EADO 2025
  • STiP
  • Webinars
    • ESDO – GI Cancer – ASCO GI 2026
    • ESDO GI Cancer – ESMO 2025
  • Contact
  • Other specialties
    • Dermatology
    • Hematology
    • Respirology
    • Cardiology
    • Rheumatology
    • Neurology
  • SIGN UP
  • SIGN IN
    • Login
    • Account
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.